2043 – Instituting the Beyond

BEYOND SCIENCE

BEYOND SANITY

BEYOND CONTROL

Serenity Trough Technology

[/\RB()RI/\ Institute motto 1966]

I think one should dedicate more thinking to the various cinematic build environments, the iconic pop cultural institutions and fictional modernist architectures hosting “the Beyond”. There are many instances of cinematographic altered state eeriness and paranormalcy that have an actual headquarters. There is a plethora of recent examples starting with Alex Garland’s massive wild nature surrounded mansions (actually Norvegian hotels) in Ex Machina and remote and secretive quantum computing facilities (DEVS series). Even more recently, Netflix TV horror series Archive 81 presents an archivist painstakingly reconstructing a series of burned VHS 1990s tapes inside a remote 1980s brutalist ‘medialab’ situated in the wilderness of Catskill mountains, employed by an opaque LMG corporation.

I want to retcon this older article — in the light of so-called Tartaria conspiracy — basically, a QAnon architectural (hyperstitional) conspiracy that sounds a bit like the Mandella effect but focuses on built environments, of their perceived ‘erasure’ 19th c historicist buildings by modern counterparts, a longing for a lost imperial grandeur and the pop-up fairgrounds (Potemkin Village) that have characterized International World Exhibition or Colonial Fairs and the like (based on a detailed article by Zach Mortice).

This nostalgia for past sumptuous interiors and expensive construction materials coincides with what was perceived as the impersonal, cold, and abstract allure of modernist housing or architectural project stranded in a wasteland of prefab, post-war white suburbia. Modernist housing as a place of corruption, conspiracy, and malaise is somewhat paradoxical and Ballardian late XX and early XXI construct — as modernist inexpensive housing was initially meant to break free of the inherited privileges of high bourgeoisie and aristocracy. They also signaled a new move towards affordable housing, welfare and a break from the inhumane living conditions of the working class and urban poor in 19 c industrial towns. Modernist architecture, in its finest expressions, was a direct critique of the deadening hypocrisy of previous historicist styles, the perceived wastefulness or eclecticism of previous eras (including High Imperialism) be it Victorian houses or numerous revivalist examples (Gothic, Neoclassical, Renaissance etc).

Cinema history starting with noir style movies from the 40s and 50s adopted German Expressionist formal principles, the ‘painting with light’ in the words of John Alton — to make modernist American houses and architecture the backdrop of anomie, high-level corruption, consumerism, true dens of vice of mid XX century US capitalism. This has been amply documented by Thom Andersen in his 2003 video collage essay Los Angeles Plays Itself — hommage which I have been reviewing for Timespacewarps. That being said, I did not intervene too much in the text below (if you find the time and got the patience to read it) please bear in mind that such think-tank dystopian representations in SF movies of corporate or private spaces obscure a longer history of modernism and its roots that were associated with both socialist and working-class progressive politics of urbanism and city planning (especially in Europe in its early German Bauhaus, Soviet and Austrian Red Vienna phases). Although there are obviously important exceptions like — the Fountainhead book and movie demonstrate — that focuses almost exclusively on the architect and architecture as a sort of virile suprematist ideal.

the ominous LMG building in Archive 81 (2022)

In order to generically trace these institutes and buildings I am going to an older 2010 classic – a definite cult psychotronic (Canadian) favorite: Beyond the Black Rainbow. It’s a fantastic directorial debut by director Panos Cosmatos and a movie that is more than 10 years yet does not feel dated even if he is probably more known for directing Mandy (2018). That is probably because it is a movie built around a sort or latent-future VHS artefact, one you might find discarded at a yard or garage sale, or one digitized by the LA art collective Everything is Terrible! that actively reedits, samples and digs into a seemingly endless infodump of US home video oddities. Beyond the Black Rainbow feels like a ‘found footage’ or even better a ‘found movie’ that somehow should have been made in the halcyon days of scifi/horror direct-to-video 1970s-1980s. It is a movie that never got made, or a movie that we weren’t allowed to watch as kids at the time (perhaps like Panos Cosmatos and his Video Attic childhood experiences). You can make your own list of cherished references and still it stands on its own. It is early Cronenberg Stereo/Crimes of the Future, early Lucas THX 1138, spaceage Kubrick. Include Michael Mann’s 1983 The Keep, Ken Russel’s Altered StatesCarpenter’s Darkstar, even some David Lynch thrown in there, Tarkovsky’s SolarisStuart Gordon’s From Beyond, Suspiria by Dario Argento, E. Elias Merhige’s Begotten as well as recent classics such as Gaspar Noe’s Enter the Void (2010) or Daft Punk’s Electroma. This treasure trove is supplemented by cult movies as Phantasm 1979 making it a hidden index of all those incredible indie horrors and thrillers exploring weird alternate realities and possible futures.

Beyond the Black Rainbow 2010s is as hyper designed as PHASE IV by Saul Bass (1974) – a truly incredible movie about the rise of mutated, superintelligent social insects (ants) and the birth of a new, hybrid, hivemindfull humanity, that emerges out of these inhuman assimilation processes and transformations. The final ending scene of PHASE IV (that got cut out initially) could also be a missing part from Beyond the Black Rainbow. It features a long sequence in which the human heroes seem to emerge out of a sandy anthill to unveil themselves as chosen Adam&Eve of the new-hive swarm symbiosis. It contains a lot of new age elements but somehow pushes them into a somber, scientistic and utterly stark and scarry transhumanist territory. It looks almost like a promotional video for a new human-swarm-insect utopia blended with desertic Dune ecology. The esper psy theme made me think about the heyday of psi manga/anime masterpieces. Elena, the psy prisoner of Arboria Institute is almost like a government special op child – featured as the “Esper” military-industrial experiments of AKIRA (1982-1990) or social housing conditions, isolation and devastating psychic battles of DOMU: A Child’s Dream (1980-81).

Music-wise and sound-design wise it is also a treat. Forget the ost 80s synth renaissance driven by Drive (one year later than Beyond the Dark Rainbow by the way) and check Jeremy Schmidt (aka Sinoia Caves, aka space-rocking Black Mountain) using a lot of vintage analog kosmische synth gear – extensive use of Mellotron, Korg Cx-3 organ, Moog Taurus bass pedals etc in one of the best scores I’ve ever encountered (will get back on that).

As an avid stalker at Mind, Body & Spirit festivals in Bucharest, a small collector of hypnosis& mind electronics tapes and DIY psychotronic weapons forger, I was surprised to finally find a movie that not only boldly reflects on subjectivities forged in the Century of the Self (Adam Curtis’s convoluted convergence of psychoanalysis/propaganda/public relations/human potential movement/self motivation/marketing focus groups), but attunes them to Lovecraftian brand of LSD-tinged forbidden knowledge & cosmic dread. It starts with an opening sequence of a promotional film made somewhere in 1960s by the Arboria Institute founder – Dr. Mercurio Arboria ( (played by Scott Hylands) that is also author of the “BE  YOUR SELF” textbook featured at some point. We are watching a video cassette clone of the suicidal post-Heaven Gate Earth Evacuation plan, everything is presented in bright galactic colours and mesmerizing sounds, with a calm and relaxing voice bathed in a typical gritty pre-digital style kind of video hypnosis tape full of rustling forest trees, talking guru head, cosmic transcendental (corporate?!) memes and a grand crystallographic finale with the good but sinister Dr. Arboria fusing with a glowing pyramid. Apparently movie director Panos Cosmatos really based this movie on an unrealized installation, a sort of fake- mockup Institute/ intervention in the street window of an abandoned shop in Vancouver where he could actually put out pamphlets written by friends.

Arboria Institute designer chair and transparent, reflective spaces

How does the beyond gets instituted, how do such institutions get filmically instantiated?

I think that Institutes tend to live in another dimension completely. They are objects that inhabit this twilight zone of radical experimentation bordering with both perfectly legal as well as illicit. In today’s catastrophic epoch, Institutes have a propensity for disaster-prone research & development. As gated and unaccountable think tanks or welcoming research institutes, their shadowy meetings, boards of directors are always beyond the reach of the public. They can work as incubators of shareholder or (newly) so-called stakeholder capitalism (driving the stake through the hearts of the people), and their influence gets described as vast lobbying powers that shape politics from afar while ignoring public opinion, thus giving architectural form to conspiracy theories born out of toothless institutional critiques.

In a way, I consider myself a tiny part of their virtual existence of these institutes, or at least in my benign prankster capacity – a potential twilight member thereof. It is as if these fictive institutes have been using their cinematic notoriety to usurp or subvert real institutional and disciplinary boundaries not only in matters of research/work/bioethics but also by making us live and experience ‘grey areas’ where mindfulness, wellness, sponsoring prosper. These are the exteriors and interiors of a recently sanitized military-entertainment carcass. Rarely do institutes get a mark – beyond a symbol or a logo. They are non-representational places, banal incubators of predatory financial techniques, corporate dealings, pyramid schemes that mostly end up in the press only after a scandal.

infamous German online payment processor and financial services provider ‘unicorn’ – WIRECARD offices

The ultra-modernist Arboria Institute is really the main character of the movie, setting its visual characteristics, pace, mood and conceptual magnetism by being a sort of architectural and physical extension of the barely human Dr Barry Nyle (played amazingly by Michael Rogers) head of research, and a protege of Dr Aboria. Dr Barry Nyle is the main hellraiser of the story and his Institute is not dark or brooding, but a brightly lit, pulsating, transparent, high tech ‘smart’ environment (before smart was invented – the action takes place in anno 1983). It is by no means a Lovecraftian space – full of oozing, chtonian, primordial slime but completely aseptic, reflective, transparent and celestial.

a scene from the Laboria Institute that reminds me of Ex Machina mansion

Hermetic rooms and labyrinthine structure reflect both the doctor’s mental corridors as well as the kind of futuristic kaleidoscopic mindfullness this Institute is supposed to promote. So what was the Institute promoting or offering in its own word? Again, this is not the kind of Shining hotel, pregnant with a haunted past, built on top of an indigenous cemetery, but fat with a grandiose dystropian-transhumanist future. However, at some point, we get a hint that there is something behind the transparent, shimmering interiors. A backdoor where the actual maintenance and care-work or low payed jobs by immigrants are taking place, the moment Elena finally manages to escape the Arboria trap – she enters a sort of normal kitchen where loud Mexican music & radio is playing.

One of the many rooms of the Arboria Institute

To me Dr Barry Nyle looks like a demented Professor X gone completely wacko in the search of new X-Men recruits or even THE one mutant.  I also love the fact that his humanity is somehow a cross-dressing act. In order to function, to reintegrate into his research, he has to mimic ‘normality’. His ‘humanity’ is most evidently propped up by costume and cosmetics (or ‘appliances’ as his wife calls them) – such as wigs or contact lenses. With repetition and daily rituals he is pasting over his radical ‘difference’, he is most of the time (until his final and last metamorphosis) perfectly hiding like the They Live extraterrestrial under an exterior. Yet this exterior is itself pretty skewed, more frightening than his actual visage. This trick does not work, in fact it enhances the enormity of his travesty.

His bouquet of therapeutic mindfulness wonder techniques are (more obvious than ever) tailor-made for today’s self-exploitation, fatigue society and value-extraction (or extortion). “Happiness, content and inner peace” are on the lips of the founding figure yet this institutionalisation of improvements and actualization is the problem. The Arboria Institute is in his words: “… worldwide… at the forefront of neuro-psychology and new therapeutic technologies…”. “…[B]enign pharmacology, sensory therapy and energy sculpting” – all these new tools are there to guide the needful and paying clientèle. His mantra sounds like the bland sales pitch of a Silicon Valley founder or transhumanist in search of ultra rich CEO sponsorships. The state-of-the-art facility and the geodesic Biosphere gardens (based on The Bloedel Floral Conservatory and aviary in VancouverBritish Columbia) seem to distillate enhanced cognition and heightened sensory experience into a better and brighter future. Here I would say Beyond the Black Rainbow meets another favorite of mine (although with a completely different mood, texture and aestethics) ; the 1993 Ozzie splatterstick BODY MELT directed by Philip Brophy (a true predecessor to the Crank movies). BODY MELT is also framed by a sort of porno-Pharma wellness farm – a sort of biopolitical regime of the Pharmacopornographic Era magnificently theoretized in Testo Junkie by Brazilian contemporary writer and philosopher Paul B. Preciado.

Vimuville employees, Body Melt 1993

Here is a 1990s imaginary experimental institute offering free samples of various pharmaceutical supplements to local, white, middle-class residents and dedicated clients of Melbourne. The Vimuville facility is maybe a more grotesque body horror counterpart of Arboria Institute, from the helpers and handyman employees they are not under control but testosterone-enhanced bodybuilders bodies with high-pitched helium voices. Yet Vimuville also features a fabulous introductory promotional video + branded Big Pharma products promising revitalization & natural good health  trough state-of-the art health & leisure that are getting fairly close to Arboria’s mission statement. Needless to say, insiders at the institute as well as the (ignorant) human test subjects are all falling prey to the mutagen and hallucinatory capabilities of the new all-powerful-experimental porno-pharmaceuticals with various destructive results such as: tentacled meat-flowers pregnancies and sentient placentasexploding penises, elongated serpentine tongues, living moving snot and many other exquisite body horrors. Body Melt reaches the video stalls at the moment when Zoloft, Prozac and a bunch of other mood enhancers hit the market.

In contrast with BODY MELT, Beyond the Black Rainbow somehow chooses to mostly keep out of sight (but not out of mind) the brutal and horrific mindbody effects of its pharmaco- neuro- enhancement technologies. Both JG Ballard and early Cronenberg come to my mind as investigators of the dark and radical potential of institutes and experimental life research facilities. Fictional psychoterapist Hal Raglan (The Brood 1979) who runs the Somafree Institute and wrote the Psychoplasmatics textbook “The Face of Rage” promotes a sort of primal scream, confrontational, -letting go of your suppressed emotions technique. He manages to induce what are bodily transformations, physiological changes, uncontrollable mutations and a new breed of children. All these all the breed of a newly pro-Life anti-abortion laws conservative consensus at the end of the 70s that is violently attacking abortion clinic s and physically endangering both patients and terrorizing their doctors.

Stereo 1969 student patients

Again, we have numerous other examples built environments in Cronenberg’s early movies, such as the experimental clinic of Dr Dan Keloid from the Keloid Clinic specializing in plastic surgery (Rabid 1977) as well as Dr Luther Stringfellow’s and his human-socio-cybernetic experiments at the sanatorium of the invented Canadian Academy of Erotic Inquiry (Stereo 1969). Reflections of the cold war think tanks, high weirdness laboratories or corporate para-scientific incubators, they unleash unpredictable evolutionary outcomes, beyond-human infestations, induced telepathic, sexual energies & out-of-control tests.

Stereo 1969, hallways of the Canadian Academy of Erotic Inquiry

The Black Rainbow’s trajectory jumps from this New Age Esalen-like beginnings to a well-established (and prosperous) early Silicon Valley future present situated in 1983. The ALIEN(1979)-like opening titles feature a red magmatic date that lits up slowly and eerily out of a pitch-black background. The title sequence is played on top a impressive cosmic drone reminding me of Robert Rich’s “Hayagriva”(Trances album) (on youtube), one of my favorite sound pieces ever (really played it in a loop for hundreds of times), incidentally also made in 1983.

What is common to both BODY MELT and Beyond the Black Rainbow is what medical ethnographer Stefan Ecks called a “globalized anxiety about drugs” (p 187) in his book Eating Drugs: psychopharmaceutical pluralism in India (great review by Erica Rockhold on somatosphere). The potentially destructive interplay and reinforcement of traditional and non-traditional methods is rarely explored I nmovies to my knowledge. The drugs offered wholesale on both Vimuville & Arboria blur the lines btw “things” and “authentic self” being sold as one single commodity (again Erica Rockhold), prefiguring a preferential (psychopharmaceutical) way of access towards a better and more ‘genuine’ SELF, however shallow this promise might be. They sell mental/body control as an enviable commodity in a world of stagnating wages. What they do is blur the already viscous borders of instant wellness, pre-packaged alternatives, naturopathic marketing, detox lifestyles that prepare a new world swimming in mood enhancers and dieatary supplements. There is a crucial observation by Stefan Ecks that I would also apply here. It is easy to forget that both tech Singularity -proponents and tech entrepreneurs are deeply medicated individuals, part of a largely unintended naturalization of prescriptive psycho pharma that was historically taking place within alternative, non- Allopathic traditions (also Western) such as the enlightened pharmacopeia & herbalist knowledge of the new age communes, inadvertently preparing the way for a new therapeutic Pharmacopornographic Era. Psychopharmaceutical assimilation of mind drugs as mind food (see contemporary India) is also marginally present in Beyond the Black Rainbow plot. The destructive potential of chemical enhancement and self-building in this movie coincides with a lack of ‘normal’ food intake.

The characters in Beyond the Black Rainbow never eat or never have food shown around them (apart from some vicious raw meat display in one scene). Food intake is being substituted by injections and repeated pill swallowing throughout the movie. Please prove me wrong, but I think it’s an important clue that Dr Barry Nyle refuses any food when he gets ‘home’ (home and Institute seem to be contiguous spaces) and automatically moves towards his pill eating ritual.

Dr Barry Nyle removing his ‘appliances’

Needless to say, for the Romanian context, there is the garish MISA/Bivolaru episode of the early 90s, a very strange historical episode including arrests, secret service involvement, accusations of a porn tape rings, all the hallmarks of current conspirational sensationalism and QAnon data drops. “Spiral hugging rituals” on the beach, group sex, urinotherapy etc. came to characterize 1990s Romanian media takes of MISA. It all ended up with guru Bivolaru seeking political asylum in Sweden in 2005, and his exile strangely (at least in its Romanian context) prefigures another (very different) episode  – the Ecuadorian/Swedish exile of Julian Assange. While it’s very easy to demonize and maybe ridicule the cultish aspects of the Bivolaru affair, what is been overlooked is how such a fairly banal ‘sect’ or pop phenomenon transcends cultural pop borders at the end of the 1980s. Harshly repressed by the state/secret service MISA (and other so-called ‘cults’) are considered not only an internal menace & perfect scapegoating, but more important – a contender and direct competitor for the ideological control of volkish energies, competing with identity ethno-politics promoters and the remaking of post-1989 neolib nation states in Eastern Europe.

The cosmic synth sound of Sinoia Caves/Jeremy Schmidt (on par with excellent sound design by Eric Paul) that I’ve been mentioning is very close to the early scores of Carpenter as well as German old school electronica greats such as Tangerine Dream, Amon Duul II, Klaus Schulze or Ashra Temple. Curiously enough it’s not only just classics again – but other hard to pinpoint ost such as 80s Manhunter or Risky Business (remember the Tom Cruise debut), scores with a certain vaporware feel.

Sound matches perfectly the 35mm Panavision 2/40 ratio camera work courtesy of Norm Li. I think this is what doesn’t let this movie experience slump into pure visual stylishness and slow pace stupor as long as their is some ominous humming, chiming, droning brooding pulses of sound. Please listen with your headphones on to the elevator door closing and opening! The futuristic bleeps, button preset sounds – a whole aural environment makes interactions palpable and touchable – showing a pre-touchscreen kinship (Videodromesque?! aliveness). Sound effects of Beyond the Black Rainbow impart architectonic sentience with an ability to click swoosh and respond. An ability embedded in artificial emotional habitats (and psychedelic mind tapes) that let the surfaces shimmer, open and flicker when caressed.

Please consider the following scene: the moment when Dr Barry Nyle comes home to his prairie style Biosphere II-like habitat (The Bloedel Floral Conservatory), full with natural wood, metallic edges and a near-seamless integration of garden surroundings. A perfect example of organic materials recombined & enhanced into modernist surfaces. His wife is somehow in a sort of perpetual daze/-meditatitve state and he has this completely dull dialogue of “I think I’m gonna go earlier to bed tonight”. Nothing out of ordinary right? Well, Dr Nyle face gets moulded into strange spasms and barely composed expressions, containing some deep neurosis, while his wife’s face is lying on the edge of the frame (the movie has mostly one face/one frame, never two faces meeting in the same rectangle). This quiet and eerie dialogue is punctuated by the distant wailing of a humpback whale (I think) singing from the bottom of some uncharted ocean (or deep mediation tape?), an eerie reminder of the deep waters that will soon swallow us all.

The Sentionaut puppet infinite regress

Enter The Sentionaut – a Tron/Electroma kind fully costumed being, a sort of artificial being, a clone or androgynous higher being that is somehow monitoring (?!) all the vital data inside the maze-like architecture of the Arboria Institute. I distinctly loved the brief phone-call communication between a visibly annoyed Dr Nyle and an indecipherable machine-like chatter (almost like a pre dial-up sound) connection with some nether entity (the Sentionaut?). Unsurprisingly, his answers sound also calm and automatic, like those NSA agents or top managers talking about “comprehensive lists”, “great” and “we have a system in place”. 

Psychotropic reality can also be psychotropic trivia, as our ordinary, everyday life becomes more drenched with injectable sensations, intensified perceptions and pre-digested thoughts. We have been living and growing up all along in a Videodromesque symbiosis with media TV/tape technologies, and this shows in this movie too. This pre Internet era of TV experiences transform the televisual into an almost mystical medium, a way to rebuilt reality and even recycle memories. There are moments when the Arboria Institute comes near to the Soylent Green’s euthanasia clinic and body recycling ideals with primeval nature and symphonic music in the background. One more word about the father of the director Panos Cosmatos – George A. Cosmatos, known as the director of Rambo First Blood Part II and Tombstone, but also of COBRA from 1986. Cobra was one of those childhood top ten movies you cannot forget. It was one of those slick movies who made it into Socialist Romania’s 80s underground video cassette scene. I remember very distinctively the scary ring leader of the evil gang – a pschotic killer called “The Night Slasher” played by an incredible Brian Thomson. He wasn’t your usual loner, but the brutal leader of the “New Order” group of social-darwinist (white supremacist?) killers. He used a very peculiar weapon – a scary sort of spiked slasher/cleaver, a really brutal piece of work. The Night Slasher’s cleaver bears a direct resemblance with Dr Barry’s “Devil’s Teardrop” (a perfect D&D name). However this metallurgic harbinger of death (that reappears in Mandy as Nicholas Cage’s weapon of choice) is something really unique, maybe only matched by a set of gynaecological instruments for operating on mutant women (Dead Ringers).

I will leave out the important figure of – Elena, who seems to be another Sadako (Ringu) figure with vast extra-sensorial capacities but actually doesn’t quite manage to completely fulfill her caged and very dangerous telekinetic & telepathic role.

There is also a memorable sensory deprivation tank flashback – a key reference point in the unfolding of the movie and curriculum vitae of the characters. This acid trip test – is the original transcendental ascent/descent into another dimension, more Lovecraftian than Buddhist. It is a cosmic abyss that sticks to the intruder. It enhances but at the same time manages to physically and psychically mutilate the protagonist. The new dark enlightenment afterglow goes very wrong. The telekinetic/psychotronic abilities achieved are coterminous with a new existence that requires more and more stabilizers and inhibitors. I will only add that the extra-sensory knowledge that the Dr brought back is akin to the one gained during the Event Horizon spaceship experience. What is most abhorrent for H P Lovecraft is not so much the indifference of the cosmos or a world withouth us but the impurification of a supposed unchanging species specific essence. Misgenation is Lovecraft’s greatest horror, the loss of ‘human’ essence or the dilution thereof. The altered states alter the body,leaving living brain and eye tissue permenently scarred. This collision btw such Lovecraftian -degeneration fears- and the blissed space-out new ageism should be familiar to science fiction fans. Beyond the Black Rainbow there are all these changing ideas about nature, about a supposed human nature, even the impact of evolutionary theory in pop culture. Beyond life-changing earthly techniques, mind electronics, theta-wave and delta pulse CDs resulting into cataleptic states and unavoidable interstellar voids – there is the possibility of embracing an entirely artificial environment in preparation for space age travels.

Elena – the experimental subject

The Black Rainbow prism contains all the flower power rainbow colours and also the Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow histories of man-machine alchemical romance. It is a bleak fable because it somehow turns the Reichian theories on their head, as every orgasm and energetic overflow is being carefully harvested, uploaded and put to work in a similarly vein to what Shaviro had to say in a post about Dusan Makavejev’s WR: Mysteries of the Organism. There is also a hint that the absent political or cultural-economic environment might be conspiring with this unleashed paranormacy (we hear on TV the voice of Reagan). In fact that we are in the darkest point of the Reagonomics Cold War control-crazy paranoia, ongoing propaganda wars, the Iran-Contra affair. During the final larval stage Dr Barry Nyle gets dressed up in a scaled, customized and futuristic looking (Manuel) Noriega)-labeled jacket.

Dr Barry Nyle in his final metamorphosis

Remember Noriega? He’s the CIA-employed statesmen & druglord, ex-psyops trainee at the infamous School of the Americas (short for Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation) and military dictator of Panama that ruled the country before he got deposed by his former supporters in 1989 (20 December is the date of the US invasion of Panama). Dr Barry Nyle now looks like THX 1138, a sinister harbinger of future doom, an unexpected psychopharma enhanced terminator shedding off the last of his atrophied Homo sapiens appliances.

‘Re-absorption into the Cycle of Life’, ‘Be Your Self’ and ‘enlightenment’ are to be read as utter and unavoidable posthuman traps of reptilian chic, mere addons to Dr Barry Nyle skin shedding.

*I tried to not detract or offer too much attention to the very and present historical Institutes and neoliberal think thanks that continue since the Cold War period of the XX c to shape and determine significant aspects of the world we live in. In this category one obvious candidate is The Mont Pelerin Society born out of the “Colloque Walter Lippmann” or the heterogeneity of such “thought collectives” (as documented by Quinn Slobodian in Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism). Others have done it much better and my focus was on fictional and pop cultural Institutes. In a sense, in the historical examples there is not so much psychotropic experiment at work but instituting “the beyond” as a mathematically calculable quantity (transforming the unpredictable into the merely probabilistic) by betting and hedging against ist and by producing predictive reports that can be speculated upon. This is a fundamental part of the logic of capital at the moment – as Justin Joque documents in his recent book just out from Verso – Revolutionary Mathematics: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and the Logic of Capitalism. It is not difficult to gaze into the real abyss, say the horrors of how the business world tries to anticipate or circumvent radical changes. You just have to read reports by old/current neoliberal stalwarts as the Aspen Institute from the business leaders perspective. There you can the huge contradiction of wannabe ‘woke’ capital or bump into the same buzzword “stakeholder capitalism”, “ethical tech”, “decentralized”, “inclusive”, “DEI(diversity equity inclusion)”, “symphony of human progress”,  “inclusive & equitable human flourishing”, “more efficient”, “unleashing potential for ourselves and those around us”, “companies that embrace innovation will be part of the solution” and so on and so on…

Hypnagogic Sound/Vibration Tape 1982

I found a “mind electronics” tape on the excellent (Arboria- flavored) crystalvibrations.blogspot.com music blog called “Hypnagogic Sound / Vibration Tape” from 1982 (ha! one year before the Black Rainbow showdown) published by Suthpen’s Valley of the Sun publishing. I warmly recommend this oldskool tape – during insomniac stressed out nights or re-programmable bureau naps. It has a distant lo fi deep warp engine hum, a de-magnetized, really weird pulsing repetitive sound to it. These hypnotic tapes come right out the high weirdness new age cassette rack – made by one of the foremost researchers into proto brain hacking, zappers, alpha/theta waves, binaural beats and mind electronics.

1979 – interview En by Rares Moldovan (interviuri futurologice 2021)

N.E.U.R.O. aka Rares Moldovan has been sending questions all around with answers posted on his blog. He also started doing a series of recorded interviews which I am curious about. His questions were generous and wide-ranging, so I was able to avoid falling into the pitfalls of inevitable navel-gazing. Feel like almost excusing myself for the length of it. This text material was my participation at the OFF WORLD COLONIES group show in Timisoara at the Indecis Artist Run space, a show that I could sadly not attend. I translated it and extended the interview in English for their catalog.

1. Do you think that imagining the future could be the first step to contribute in manifesting it?

First, let’s not limit the power of imagination, this “capacity” to imagine to just our common use of it as only pertaining to humans, a unique human faculty or a particular ability. Just a capacity of the capacious. A fantabulous happy extension of an evolved cognition, the marked and significant difference of lionized primates, such as humans used to feel as their branch diverged from other related species.

Let’s imagine that imagination is certainly more widely found and more basic than expected – a precondition to all the other “higher” faculties regarded by many as superior or distinctive.

For me and for others it feels more and more important to be able to accept and speak for example about bacteria or non-sapient blue-green algae in these nearly frivolous, imaginative terms. There is a comics from 1979 based on ideas by Dr Timothy Leary, a Neurocomics that treats the primordial soup as an irreverent cocktail of excitable ingredients, utterly promiscuous, and imaginatively spilling over (pls check the digital version here https://timespacewarps.wordpress.com/2021/01/27/1760/ ).

Let us see how we can question our own favorite evolutionary just-so stories, stories that get constantly remade. What about a story that shows how our particular transformation was achieved historically from distantly related, non-neuronal, brainless beginnings? Let us understand, with our current brains the way of being in the world of organisms that enjoy their lives without a central nervous system.

What do you do with this “imagination” that presupposes a complete lack of imagination around itself?

It would be worthwhile investigating how we can recognize or include the manifestation of an imagination that is clearly phylogenetically and epigenetically overflowing, one that complicates the arbitrary borderlines of a standard neuro- intelligence model. A more gradual and universal one. One that would put to shame our supposed neurotypical preferences. And even as this model gets more and more untenable, it tends to slide, captivated and kidnapped, lured by the supposedly lower ‘concrescent’ reality of the world.

With this background of unequal distribution hovering around us – a (preposterous) scarcity of imagination in the history of biological life that became the main tale told by the life sciences, we have arrived at a moment of crossroads. I considered my contact with STS (Science and Technology Studies) and history of science important because it made me question the very restricted and canonical histories told by the life sciences about themselves or as transmitted by generations and generations of biology manuals.

Otherwise, we keep risking remaining conceptually blocked in our physio-chemical understanding, blindfolded by the dominance of one domain, resisting all those ideas arising out of various domains of the evolving life sciences, losing our chance to keep up with all the new discoveries being made all the time.

Some call it a “Crisis of the Imagination”. I do not know if it is a crisis or not, but it would be a mistake to attribute it by default to the human, or Germaine to the fine arts, therefore entirely and exclusively human or humanistic. A crisis is only one if it keeps mired in just coffee talk about quantum physics and string theory while forgetting about various levels of symbiosis levels, of the role played by extremophile Archeobacterial lifeforms living in impossible (for us) conditions, or about the iconic role played by Tardigrades, seen everywhere online and offline, seemingly the perfect pre-adapted for life in outer space and pop SF series such as Star Trek.

It is important to see how we get socially constrained and so strict when and if we imagine a future, a common future imagined not just by some bipedal apes. Imagination is somewhere else then, especially if it does not help us imagine another world. Imagination is an agential and tangentially unpredictable mode, actively and reactively involved in emanating, speculating, fabulating, emitting “other kinds” of worlds.

If we refer strictly to the patriarchal and systemically racist capitalism we currently participate in, one that has subjugated and exploited billions and billions of species on this planet crushing this world in its grasp, it feels more impossible or unachievable than ever to exercise our imagination. It becomes very easy to imagine why we live materially in our very own flesh and bodies the closing in of a creaking opportunity window without being able to do something about it.

Our current worldview, where other worlds have been condemned to stand on the losing side of the equation, prefers the word “unfit” – a term that puts all in the same box as maladaptive, improbable, wasteful or impossible. This strictly Adaptationist worldview is more and more maladaptive itself, and I mean here that is presupposes this fitting in as essential and unavoidable. To fit is to have to practically accept all injustices. This view justifies and rationalizes all economic and energophage inequalities, and is more and more evident and obscene by the day.

What do stromatolites dream of? What do stromatolites imagine while belching gases, not as individual cells, but as planet-wide biomass, on a grand scale collectively, contributing to a world of tomorrow under oxygenation/oxidation just a few billions of years away?

Can you identify in these bubbles of inklings of an imagination floating during a period almost impossible to imagine in human cortical terms, that made possible our ‘humaness’ that is still narrowly defined as western and whose understanding limits itself to a rusty technoscientific imaginary.

A lack of imagination that can barely communicate the vastness and scaling necessary to assess the cumulative effects of millions of exhausts pipes and changes that do not take place during millions but decades (our own lifetimes)?

Technoscience stimulated by imagination for profit is making itself responsible for the unfair mass extermination of countless species. On the other hand, it is a science that has offered as an unprecedented and vertiginous look into “deep time” and has tried to familiarize us with the hidden contribution of unknown ones. Of course, there is countless other non-modern of pre-modern examples from non-Eurocentric societies from all around the world that cherished and acknowledged this overwhelming contribution by other creatures, beings, entities, spirits.

Science is only now finally recognizing the collective work of inhuman, non- more than human (more than fungus, more than plant etc) ones, a work that produced this outer protective layer calle atmosphere. A layer where we started walking and became conscientious of late, without therefore asking ourselves who made this protecting shield that has protected us and other creatures from most of the cosmic rays or UV radiation during millions of years.

This atmospheric or climatic imagination implies the apparition of a future where free-floating cells dividing continuously got stuck to each other, never alone anymore and only sporadically and dangerously autonomous inside their larger organismic units (see for ex our current understanding of the evolution of cancer cells).

These cells, meanwhile, started showing behaviors of a vaguely coordinated organized kind, a quorum-sensing that took life to another level than mere individualities, making waving coordination into a “ciliary collective walk”.

movement-of-a-placozoa-trichoplax-adhaerens

Animals have a direction now because animals lacking a nervous system such as the Trichoplax a. placozoan have imagined and invented directional movement. It is really hard to understand for us that we should not be talking about a given direction of life – that early life is not progressing towards something but a “random motion away from simple beginnings” (Stephen Jay Gould).

The very first levels of organization that enabled early movements appear as a disequilibrium of hundreds of microscopic ciliated cells in a gradient field – as the movements made today by multicelullar model organism Trichoplax adhaerens, considered one of the most basal metazoans.

Our extremely complicated brains are now unable to grasp why there is no need for brains to obtain the first cellular coordination of millions of cells, yet today we definitely struggle to obtain large scale coordination in a Ministry for the Future (as per Kim Stanley Robinson), so that we can preempt a nearly inevitable situation: the climate crisis. Difficult to perceive, to conceive and start imagine this very basic advancement of tissues or differentiated cellular lines as they search their spatial-temporal momentum…

2. Does a critical-analytical perspective of the past have a constructive role in modeling the future in your view?

I am agreeing with those that say we should try to circumscribe the finitude of such a total future – a totalizing future such as the one promoted by a series like Star Trek let’s say (even if I continue watching and enjoying it!). The series was bold enough to include gigantic tardigrade-like extraterrestrial beings navigating a mycelial network that holds the galaxies together, or a character called Stamets based on actual mycologist and mushroom enthusiast Paul Stamets. On the other hand, one should embrace the possibility that one is always partial, in the sense of being part and partial whenever exploring such present possibilities and future impossibilities.

Let us keep a big warning about a future that imposes one single unchanging version of the future upon all other species and the rest of humanity.

Let say a unique future based on just such a “warp drive” invention, i.e. the impact of one invention that pushes inevitably everything into the Faster Than Light era. Yes, it is an imaginary invention, but one that directs exclusively towards a total future. This is something if not entirely problematic, then full of lacunae that are not immediately noticeable, especially when that totalization is made around a technologically privileged group or one single invention.

Maybe a philosopher would say that such an analytic or critical perspective is a direct follow-up to the post-Kantian heritage that has divided western philosophy into suburbia of the mind with separated continental traditions and analytical ones.

I am not a philosopher so I will not go into detail. I will ask those interested to ask themselves in what why does any type of future depend on something more humble than what we have taken into account, even given our lofty evolutionary position, a minor something that does not even get mentioned in those version of a totalizing future.

Here is this simple observation by Charles Mudede, writing on the Seatle Slog, about the absence of green plants on the spaceships of the United Federation of Planets (the main supranational stellar union mentioned in the ST universe). Plants, as the primary providers of energy on the planet, or at least on this planet, are completely circumvented, ignored, overlooked, etc.

I appreciate you mentioned the past as well as critical philosophy – because this past is still seen with condescending superiority or even banished and demonized as traditionalist or retrograde by default. At the same time, the past is rapidly becoming a retro-future resource to be mined, because today newness lacks any novelty, fueling a desire for infinite nostalgia (see retro manias, retro futurisms of the 1980s or 1990s, retro 2000s and so on).

One of the most symptomatic under-currents of SF was cyberpunk sub genre that gets crystallized in the 1980s during the ballistic missile race btw the East and West blocks and during the first massive wave of neoliberal restructuring. As a genre it appears at a precise place – the city of Vancouver, Canada. It is a future placed in a city where the past is not perceived as surpassed, unreachable, deleted and where layers of time coexist, where you have to make use and make do with what has existed or will exist, old or new, low tech or high tech (here taking my cues from C. Mudede).

At the same time we are now in a better position to see why the Silicon Valley Californian future is not at all somber and opaque, oppressively corporate-like in the classical cyberpunk narratives, but more like a transparently corporate habitat, inexhaustible exhausting wellness and profoundly libertarian and anti-syndicalist mood more akin to The Circle movie from 2017.

Nevertheless, the cyberpunk inheritance makes it clear why we are not just neighbors to our actual neighbors or our actual flights of imagination, but neighbors to all the crazy rich and all the business park dreams on the whole planet.

It is important to understand that this cyberpunk, initially Canadian, does not repudiate temporal layering and temporal intermingling. It does permit the persistence of a constantly perishing present, temporal complicity towards futuralism, especially when PKD’s obsolescent androids and exclusive premium robotic sheep coexist.

3 How do you see the role of contemporary culture in relation with the future?

I think I partially answered this above.

Contemporary culture is too much “culture” and this search for the eco-critical dimensions that includes laboratory cultures (as in tissue cultures or yogurt cultures) comes with very meager offerings and maybe overly defined by Danone possibilities and lack of funds for blue-sky research, with a preponderance of big tech lobbies.

From Raymond Williams we have learned how difficult it is to define culture, risking to leave out somebody, abusing and emptying this word while at the same time diminishing conflicts or inherent transformations.

It is important to see how – the future is totally decoupled from the new or the truly new, in total divergence from that future promised in genre movies, in the sense that every new thing ‘is more of the same’. This monetized future is already portioned, auctioned, packaged and sold using cryptocurrencies and complex financial instruments (the so-called fintech), some of which are actually called futures. Crypto currencies belie their underlying materiality and so manage to escape our attention because we tend to forget that they run on physical infrastructure, on computers that are sometimes fueled by leftover fossil fuel somewhere at the Polar or Arctic North like in one Canadian advert trying to attract new investments.

Even if we feel placed at the bottom end of financialization, we can take this recent campaign by the BRD bank “You are the Future” and see in what way the pressures of contemporary culture (represented by financial institutions) amplify the surrounding climatic and ecological pressures on individuals, on personal payment plans, etc. and especially on this recurrent YOU – as unitary, ethnopolitical, indebted or having to pay rate till forever.

Everything is still sadly transposed in terms of you or him, or her.

It remains to be seen how much is this going against a situation that is in no way easy to isolate, locally or individually, or how slow and after how much struggle some populations and expressions, ecologies, bodies, genders, multiplicities etc. will carve themselves a space in contemporary consciousness and attention.

I think that SF in the sense of speculating and fabulating, or as speculative fiction, fantastic or scientific speculation has this role of culturally translating for both interlocutors, exactly like a device from the SF movies that can deliver meanings almost involuntarily from one extraterrestrial language into another. No unadulterated transmission, but a transmission with twists and modifications – creatively and imperfectly translating realities that necessarily surpass the individual level, the human limits of perception, especially if dealing with social, scientific and technical transformations that are impossible to calibrate.

4. Do you think that the study of the future will have a constructive impact if it would get included in the educational curriculum?

I would definitely prefer to alternate this impeding hype, the pressing and oppressing futurological drive with other things.

Maybe it is high time to include in the school curriculum something about speculative fiction instead, going back to your first question.

Embracing futurology has to be nuanced, especially if one refers to a type of future forecasting typical of the banking sector, or the start-up kind. We should have the utmost care and reservations here, taking into account the fact that everything that has to do with prognosis and forecasting from is completely engaged in ensuring the impossibility of a common future.

Futurology as packaged by tech pundits and tech gurus is easy to find, because the world seems to be full of quite myopic visionaries, even dangerous ones, in the sense that uncertainties are nowadays packaged as manageable risks and externalized on others. We do not need more singularity salesmen, or agents of a more or less conscious optimization that touches upon everything but does not change anything fundamentally.

We should always be wary and vigilant about this futurology frustrated by the borders of this world and in search of tax evasions, off-shore futurology of neglect that has become a sort of scourge, an exercise in externalizing risks on the backs of others, offering cheap predictions on demand (*or expensive one if one takes into account the habitats and lives lost in exchange): a simple business deal dressed up as a very rudimentary SF.

First, education itself is left without a future.

All those with a degree end up without a viable future, jobless, without any pension plans and ready to fall trough the gaps of a system that prepares highly qualified people for bullshit jobs. I refer directly to those jobs discussed by the late David Graeber in his book and familiar to most of us today. Even if I don’t have such a job at the moment, the clock is ticking, and I will sure join in, because there is nothing else for me.

You do not have a future, because this is the future of work, of the learned skills turned worthless in today’s terms, of careers based on educational systems have become all a subject of speculative investments and divestment. Today at the stock exchange one can bet on the lack of future of certain careers and what one is learning and hoping to graduate in. All the unprofitable lessons, the obsolete school manuals they are based on, the slowness of re-qualification or costliness of retraining get correlated by algorithms to academic disciplines and careers with loosing odds.

At the same time, the educational systems have dealt only very late with the neurodivergent, the non-neurotypical, with minds that do not obey or coincide with what was considered standard everywhere in the past. Also, very, very late we are finally starting to see jobs that take into account the autism spectrum disorders or an educational curriculum that is more inclusive in this sense.

The way our studies are being sponsored and financed always in regard to a certain future income, of either being coupled with future “liquidity” or not, gets everyone reduced to constant payment status or the incapacity to be such a source of regular payments. It gets tied down to the incapacity to reimburse in time the debt accrued during your education years.

Not only is risk calculated so that investors or shareholders would be repaid – only then you are ‘worth it’, or incentivized, only then you become part of the “meritocratic” scheme, only and only if your future career can be monetized so that you can enjoy today a scholarship or be worth all those tuition borrowings.

Betting is not just the usual corner shop betting joint, that one is just a small picturesque neighborhood get-together. We have a much more insidious betting on the potential lack of future of a large majority of school students or of students whose education was devalued from the start, or that becomes just a reason for upping the bets.

It is easier and easier to bet on the certainty of educational failure, on the loosership of certain disciplines or the obsolescence of pedagogic systems that have spent money and time to train us humans in the past and the present. Let’s just think about such classical domains as the natural sciences, or the dwindling number of field scientists, the disenfranchised humanist or liberal arts, as well as all the vocational schools of the socialist times.

We also have today this creative sector – already the main betting horse of the new economy, on one side completely fragilized and highly dependent on applications and all manner of extra financial supplements and on the other – the poster independent sector of new, so-called smart cities. All these shrinking and polluted cities that need to reinvent themselves constantly in order to attract investors and clean their image (what happens in Timisoara “and soon in the whole country!” to rhyme in with the Revolution 1989 slogan).

Sometimes the students who can afford the costs of high theory of highly-rated teachers and interesting courses – are already from the privileged classes, those that come from rich milieus from the very start (I am saying this because of acquaintances that do this kind of teaching in Germany, so it is not just an Eastern European thing).

On the other hand, there is so much educational material online, so many videos, tutorials, fabulous YT channels – be it philosophy, transgender studies, dialectics, history of science, technology, political economy etc cultural studies, biohacking etc.

Yet it is true that one gets to them when already exhausted, bored and disillusioned.

If you do not represent an investment, a vested interest, you are suffering all sorts of consequences, mental and bodily ones.

On the other side the paradox is that nobody dictates your curriculum any longer, you can choose what and how to built up your ‘looser’ educative kit, for the very fact that such courses do not represent an investment, no winning bet, and you can maybe use this false freedom to combine the most unwieldy materials and contradictory things. For example let us imagine a course based on SF speculations about education from the future and immediate examples about educational betting or critical theory and afro pessimist thinkers.

It is tempting and interesting to follow the explosive rise of Chinese science fiction (be it awards, translations, studies) combined with the very pressure of the “gaokao” exams (a sort of third year of final year school examination in China) that determine the future existence of an entire generation, this pressure that rains upon future generations (everywhere) that are obliged to push themselves to the max, and to pick up all the debts and fails of previous largely ‘irresponsible’ boomers.

5. What projects are you working on now?

I can tell you I am working on something that I hope will never end.

Because you specifically called it project – I will pick up on this complete mess of a word, on the fact that we already describe this way our work or this type of structure where we find ourselves no matter what.

When you say ‘project based’ you are employing the neoliberal newspeak – trying to dissimulate this type of nomadism from project to project for what it is – a complete disaster, a way to embellish and make it sound cool, while it is actually a common disease and a currently incurable one.

And I want to include here that blind tech-nomadism, of carrying your workspace, working from a distant beach, no matter if you work for NATO, for humanitarian purposes, or for the election campaign in another country, using your skills no matter what the requirements, exactly the way Cambridge Analytica did it (just one infamous case among many I guess).

Why are these things valued in this way on the job market? Why are such beach remote working positions made possible etc promoted in adverts with the promise of a fat paycheck that helps you jump planes like a DJ from country to country? Well, this is sure one of the most toxic and polluting things existing on the planet today.

And here we must mention that this tech-nomadism of course does not include all those millions of migrant workers or seasonal workers, all that cheap nomad workforce, whose continuous devaluation has kept up the profits of global entrepreneurship. Those very migrants circulated from one smart building site to another, from one asparagus field to the next, without even the minimal protection accorded to the medieval stonemasons during the building of cathedrals.

I am also migrating from Bucharest to Berlin and back and have tried to keep this come n go at a minimum. Very few can afford a fixed place. Very few are employable in anything but on a project base, where and when the project season is on. These projects are a euphemism for free-lancing, a reality that hides a cynical mercenary lifestyle without illusions and without much future talk. You are good for everything and good for nothing.

This sez a lot about the type of obsolescence that these projects imposed because whenever finished or evaluated, they get sent away and behind there is not much left. Eventually, just online crumbs that you can barely match or explain or replicate.

Still, I want to talk about my subject – since a few years I am swimming in SF studies, profiting from those that share their work generously online and those who engage with the most diverse available materials. Here I am referring to an entire corpus of research literature that does not isolate or exoticize SF, but tries to frame it, theorize with it and trough it, apply it elsewhere and conceptualize it actively.

It is a research literature that is cherishing a variety of ideas and authors, a SF that has become truly global (what did we know about Indian, Arab, Korean, pan-African SF 50 odd years ago, or even about a wider understanding of Easter European SF?).

Partly vaccinated in this way we can dive into deeper waters, catch hold of mutations, frog leaps and qualitative jumps and acknowledge their relevance for now as well as for the future.

I do not believe there is anything more commercial and more corporate as some strains of SF today, when superheroines and superheroes on-screen are recruited in sales campaigns, as art safari guides, or as models of a hyper consumer superhero with huge franchises and investments behind their caped backs.

So, on the other side I am engaged in this precarious and diaphanous exercise, arriving on the back of questions and a perplexity forged before 1989, trying to respond and co-respond with these near-future challenges by tackling the following puzzle. I am since 2 years involved in a serious and frivolous exercise of xeno-curatorship at the Rezidenta Scena 9 BRD together with Suzana Dan, Vasile Leac and Alexandru Ciubotariu.
I have been discussing with others in an informal way the nature of this puzzle that I will try to tackle below.

In its short version, I spontaneously caught it on TV, during one of the Minderiads (mineriade in RO) from Bucharest in the 1990s. From the streets we received our daily screen portions of televised audio-visual TV realism. On one of those Mineriads that remain in the collective memory as brutal and violent, from a group of miners brought from the Vale Jiului coal mining towns, one turns around towards the camera and is asked by the TV crew what are his demands.

So he answers quite sincerely: “We came to the central TV station to ask for more episodes from Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future!”.https://www.youtube.com/embed/IUwaKEXuFJQ?version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent

I kid you not! I want to take this minor anecdote and make into something quite serious and fundamental. In my regard – this TV fragment does not just reflect the cheesy, dunk humor and naivete of those years.

For me this quite provocative response from a young miner arriving in the Romanian capital city from the mining towns that would soon be ruined and shut down, give us a first tectonic sign that something is massively changing behind the scenes – that behind these televised events there is the transition from one industry to the next.

How does a miner from Valea Jiului, from the core fossil fuel extractive industries, from the soon to be dis-empowered miner syndicates – become a fan?

How does the fan get born from the settled soot of the working class? A fan, let us not forget, that is engrossed by a US-Canadian series about biodroids, immortalist bosses, digitization, experiments gone rogue, abandoned cities, lots of rusty iron, intelligent machines and the first decent 3D effects meant to give body to a vision of dystopic dimensions of a specific nature. A no-future, post-industrial landscape for people that had to deal not only with the post-human but also with a world of post-work. Where does the factory move, how does one consume, relax and gets fascinated by the history of one’s own disintegration, of “restructuring” and its own crumbling representation?

More importantly maybe, what does it mean to loose a world? What does it mean to live trough the disappearance of your world, and what does it mean to not find a place any longer in it?

From a working-class hero he becomes on TV a villain while watching it live on premium hour. We notice this shift, from a representative of those fundamental means of production, from a worker from a glorified industrialism branded almost overnight as polluting and unwanted but which gave him a collective bargaining power when confronting the dehumanizing mechanisms and pressures of capital, a shift that places him not in the back seat – but in front seat of an unwanted future.

How does this fan almost instantly become jobless, media literate and tele-visually integrated at the same time entangled in a cinematic or computational mode of production (to use the Jonathan Beller’s terms). He transforms and is transformed in his own main opponent, in the class enemy of the newly green-washed electronic industries that evangelize their zero emission goals.

At the same time, he is becoming a prosumer fan with a Netflix subscription plan, a fanatic of online streamed series. He is ready to binge-watch, netflix & chill and eager to influence the production of his favorite series and shape his favorite titles, ready to feel entitled, even ready to start planning and organizing the next Comicon together with Kaufland in Bucharest. This puzzle I feel I am involved in since a few years, if not from the moment I have seen this fragment on TV during the 90s immediately after the Revolution, a fragment one should revisit and think with even now.

6. How do you see your profession/your projects in the future?

I think we can regroup all these together with the above question.

As mentioned I suffer from a constant de-professionalization, I forget what I use to do or am supposed to do, and have gotten to the situation where it is very hard to explain or to justify myself in front of those that ask me what are you working on actually, how much is your salary, where do you get your income? What did you work on? What do you want to do now, or want to do in the future?

I get the feeling that I refused or allowed myself to refuse too many jobs whenever I was offered them during the heyday of easy offerings, refusing this enviable possibility to settle in a particular institution. This has eloped me, so I cannot pretend I have an overview on my own doings and goings.

Most of the people I know already have their .com or .ro or have built more or less assiduously a career, a trajectory, a fixed base, more or less engaged in the management of the self-image. What I see with me is a cemetery of projects, shipwrecked blogs etc.

One important thing is when your friends drag on you, and I start to appreciate this more and more, even as you did it now with this interview. I think this has been one of your favorite methodologies all along, even if not systematically pursued. I appreciate it when somebody tries to involve, question me without a particular end-result, because I’ve become more and more skeptical about all these self-evaluations. I am talking about the flighty untimely moment when somebody comes and tells you to come and join in, let’s meet, let’s think about it together. Even when ghostwriting, mind you, or pretending to be an AI!

This while each is streamlining and bulldozing his yellow brick road towards solitude. If everyone tries to actualize – in the current default talk, you completely start feeling incapable of ever doing something together with others, and I also include myself in this bizarre situation.

I had the luck and joy to collaborate interuptedly with you, with Sebastian Big, with Declan Clarke, with Bogdan Otaku Gorganeanu, Alexandra Croitoru, Vasile Leac, Milos Jovanovic, the early trio Nanca/Cosm/Gontz as I knew them once, Mimi Salajean, Mihai Lukasz, Sara Lehn, Nita Mocanu, Candidatura la Presedentie, Lucas Cantori, Ovek Finn, Dyslex, Philou from Come N Go (or this is his core band for me), Mabento Makunouchi, Claudiu Cobilanschi, Anca Benera, Biroul Melodramatic, Valentina Desideri, Bezna, Kavdanska & Dilmana, Manuel & Brynjar, Mircea Nicolae & Victor Plastic (as I met them), Nicu Ilfoveanu, with Alt Art, Protocol Cluj, Tamtam, ODD, Mes 56, with Mort “braindead” la Creier, Ion Dumitrescu, Alienocen Outernational, Würtembergischer Kunstverein Stuttgart, Nae Timotei Drob, Nicolae Comanescu, Clubul Convivialis, Cristian Darstar, Utopiana, Szilard Miklos, Florentin Tudor from Rusu & Flore, Fundatia Tranzit Sibiu si Bucuresti, Colectia Energii Regenerabile de la Fractalia and much more in what reads like some bizarre automatic writing… many more that should have probably get mentioned here.

With many more I did not collaborate directly but had the pleasure to meet, contact and enjoy their company. I cherish the rare moments I tried to curate something in the past.

I enjoyed when Mihaela Dragan invited me to talk about the Romacene and SF. I was glad that the Arhiva de Sunet came over in Drumul Taberei hood to talk about sounds from Timisoara. I enjoyed talking with students about indie horror movies, starting from the Bodrog the movie experience. I regret not organizing a cozzzmonautica at the Cuca Festival (which I still hope I will). I truly enjoyed writing about the composer Octavian Nemescu for muzica imaginara, just before he departed this world.

I felt very good being invited by Gabi P.N.E.A. to contribute to his blog Timespacewarps as a place of churning and collating and trying out ideas, sounds, perceptual trajectories & apperceptual notions, all these un-hoped for splashes in growing data pools.

More and more difficult as this conviviality becomes – this communal labor is quite improbable, as an occasion to socialize outside the social platforms towards a common task as per Feodorov dwindle down. I really enjoy this co-opting, and try not to count them or to do any rankings – always glad to return the favor, whenever I get the nerve to involve others in return.

7. What is your relation with Artificial Intelligence, or with robots?

I think I just wrote something towards this end on the blog I am contributing to with Gabi. It is a discussion starting from the recent movie by the French video clip director Seth Ickerman, a sort of age-restricted musical video clip, mostly a retro SF biopunk full of sex magick and synthwave sounds by Carpenter Brut https://timespacewarps.wordpress.com/2021/08/24/1930-blood-machines-mini-series-2019

I even have a few quite amateurish recordings uploaded on a soundclound account, a sort of plunderphonics using some linux audio software from years back https://soundcloud.com/earth-evacuation-plan/data-recovery-foundation-tapes-i-choam-corporationplanet-kaitain I think that you can hear there how my relation with what we call today AIs or robots or entities has developed, since it takes into account not only the cinematic or gaming industry examples but all the imaginary spillover all around us.

We have somehow these retrograde AIs, stuck in their virtual asistant roles that hear you, peeping on you whenever you least expect it, although under surveillance capitalism you should expect it all the time. We worry about who or what is influencing us, but we never seem to worry how we influence AIs instead, in regard of the fact that they carry a lot more agency and decisive power nowadays, deciding over the chances of many other humans, because they integrate human cultural biases almost without regulation or filtering etc. although things started changing.

For those interested, I urge them to listen these recordings on earphones and try to imagine them as part of a memory implant, residual coaching of future employees from various fictional inter-planetary corporations. More than 6 years have passed since I made this sound collage with the track name – CHOAM Combine Honnete Ober Advancer Mercantiles – exactly the corporation from Frank Herbert’s Dune that takes care of mining the spice.

So you see I am interested more about these secondary aspects, those that fall off the main equation, the way in which the very attention and buzz around “Intelligence Explosion” or the “Super Intelligence X-Risk” tends to monopolize informal meetings at the Davos conferences from Switzerland (a few years ago).
I am interested in the way a paradox or mere speculation about AIs feeds into the fears of certain high-ranking, ultra rational communities characterized by efficiency and singularity search. How curious that their attention is being disturbed, grabbed or invaded by a future AI hyperstition like Rocco the Basilisk?!

You said how do you relate – I am interested in the relational at in its most fragile and remote, this delicate relationality, easy to break, the way these feeble connections are sometimes the most important ones, not the stronger and stable ones.

In the theory of networks – these wispy links would be the most important ones, NOT the verified and tested ones, those links for example that bind members of a conspirative group, members of clan, a family, of a mafia, of a political class, of a clique etc but those that can literally hang almost on one single strand of hair.

They way you can eliminate with one single hand wash those microbes and viruses.

Another weak strong inter-relation that suddenly came to the foreground is the non-intelligent nature, a non-intelligence, a non- smartness that is very basic and gets upcycled by capitalism and especially by this growing traveling jet set.

I refer to the simple fact that COVID virus reached out so much of the planet using previous cheap flight networks, touristic routes, carried and pulled in this race that is extremely lopsided and with differing speeds of vaccination and mutation that gave rise to resistant strains that you could never call intelligent.

Not intelligent but extremely efficient at doing one thing only, of searching the weak points and the precarity of this system, its greed, it desire for profit, even by offering biopharma companies (that where always an interest of mine) a way to keep their stronghold over the patents or criminally refuse a patent waiver on COVID vaccines, even in the face of such devastation and on such a global pandemic scale.

8. How do you see the relation between technology and nature in the future?

I think I got a problem with this relation that gets chocked by a tunnel vision of one single technology – let say lets say the choke-hold on our imagination that some historical technologies have got on our explanatory power.

The way our descriptions have helped in mistreating or exploiting the various sub-divisions of life, or the way such technologies have been used as misguided metaphors or as outdated models that got reified and retained with quite damaging material results.

I refer here on the way Descartes and his default mechanicism has spilled over into the Industrial Revolution and the way agency was moved outside the organisms or denied to living beings by both neo-Darwinism and by Creationists, or placed at the level of egoist genes, organisms becoming just passive carriers or multipliers of genes. Organisms and ecologies were and are being reduced to mechanisms without feeling, sentience, emotions, ability to act etc.

Remember that example (if I am not wrong) when Descartes compares the sounds made by a dog when hurt to the sound made by the unoiled hinge of a door.

I share this passion for a certain drift towards metaphysics – precisely because metaphysics got circumscribed by the Kantian project (again a project!) as strict experiential metaphysics and the impossibility of knowing objects in themselves (the so called Kantian catastrophe). If many have sounded the death knell of metaphysics, if it became persona non grata in almost all philosophical currents or even theology, then we can revisit it whenever because it is a sort of non-naive philosophical SF that allows an applied play of various faculties (technology itself having been repudiated together with metaphysics by continental thinkers full of gravity such as Heidegger).

There is this insidious feeling that I can let myself being carried along by a certain easiness or frivolity following in the steps of the ex-mathematician A N Whitehead and the many that have taken his hints in various directions – such as Isabelle Stengers or Steven Shaviro among others – maybe I can even call my friend Ion Dumitrescu one of those. Of Whitehead’s lack of contempt towards the role of feelings and generosity towards the new, inherent in his thinking. I am not carried by his very elaborate “scheme”, but taken on board by his very encouraging tone that tries to think against the grain, or in spite of all the dead weight of all those philosophical orthodoxies.

There is a new appetite, towards a certain new kind of realism – a realism that is measured and balanced by debates about the world in all its aspects. It is a new courage of being part of a tangible reality not completely dissociated from the absolutely intangible and bizarre universe described by the physical sciences.

I do not want to bring more confusion into the game, so I prefer sincerely the way certain sci-fi books do not just let themselves be pulled by current scientific heavyweights, but throw themselves into the unknown, in a place where extrapolations fail and only mere fabulation can lead towards the extra-dimensional.

Maybe this is one of the few available ways of avoiding the strictures of replication or testability typical for scientific positivism as well as a way to get ahead of the game that has chained theoretical physics to biases and aesthetic presuppositions (like those highlighted by Sabine Hossenfelder in her provocative Lost in Math: How Beautry Leads Phyisics Astray 2018).

As an example SF should not be regarded just as a metaphor, or just exclusively a literary genre, but something direct, inevitably shared all around us, with utmost concreteness. At the same time SF offers a insistent yet vague affective palette, a literal sensor or a tool kit that can help us learn and unlearn to live with technologies, in order to multiply the experiences of another cosmotechnology.

An example would be Jeff Vandermeer (Southern Reach trilogy, or the Borne cycle). Vandermeer, just to take this well-knowns example, a relative fresh one at that – that somehow mediates and stimulates the need for an environmental posthumanism, one that has not nostalgia towards anthropocentrism, free of the residues of human exceptionalism. And this, importantly, without being misanthropic or an adorer of Gaia theory that risks falling prey to green-brown eco-fascisms as many do indeed.

His proposal – if I can call it that is to be completely immersed, co-dependent and transformational, but not in the sense of current workplace flexploitation, and at the opposite pole of domineering suprematist transhumanism that is somehow ultra-humanist and exclusivist.

I see in Vandermeer’s offer a certain critical posthumanism, pessimist and mature at the same time, but also with a lot of trust in utopian promiscuity, enriched by ambiental transhumanism and multi-species perspectives that once theorized feel more sterile and sparse than what he and others manage in their books.

Borne is for example a living weapon – biotechnology that went rogue, a feral experiment conceived as a very complex weapon that starts growing and blooming, and that seems to have a very imprecise teleology or final purpose.

Nobody knows how it got here, or nobody can trace all the necessary gene manipulations that made it possible or those pathways that stimulated its evo-development. Even its metabolism is unclear. All that does not matter because you can never take back things, at a moment when you have to learn to share the world with so many orphaned creatures, so many orphaned biotechnologies, so many banished organisms. Banished by their supposed creators or patent owners, that have long since expired and disappeared or become extinct and unrecognizable.

We have to welcome and learn to accept new refugee ecologies – that have been weaned from the measurements and quantification of the human or their initial laboratory tests (even if there they had their petri dish cradle phase), because the lab itself does not exist any longer or has fused with the entire world.

The world of Jeff Vandermeer from Borne is a world full of beings that have sprung out of the Linnean taxonomy or have left the Natural History museum behind. They are unclassified beasts of an unnatural world, exuberantly dangerous, killing you softly, tearing you to pieces gently, forlorn artificial entities. They are in search for a den wherever they can. Borne is such a found bud, one that is incredibly and attractively full of hidden fangs, a budding poisonous something that is morphing and shapeshifting when you do not look at it.

It is important to understand that it can be incredibly dangerous and at the same time very friendly and cuddly in a terrible, very unfriendly world. Arriving with tendencies and desires in tow that cannot be confused with those of the people around it, no matter how much they wish to see themselves as adoptive parents.

It is an unrecognizable world, where we cannot impose our old pastoral values of forest brotherhood as in the Romanian saying and untouched wilderness sold as România Neîmblânzită (title of a recent Romanian documentary about the supposed wilderness of Romania). Borne is the exact opposite, a preparation for an overly domesticated world that is unbound and that is transforming us almost as quick as we transform it.

We have to let go of the Greek myth that tells us about the damaging things that escaped from Pandora’s Box, because it is senseless to let ourselves be oriented by recurrent mythopoetics and vintage cosmotechnics. We should maybe follow in the lead of what Yuk Hui mentioned in his extended essay, because it is high time to cultivate and learn new things, even from the Chinese technological accounts that seem strange and unusual to many.

We have to understand what to do with such inherited myths of Western progress. What is going on with all these escaped things, with all these unfruitful things, the denied, the disavowed ones, those that left us and got dispersed around the world.

Here I refer to inventions that were never fully ours or technologies invented by others, things that where never owned even by their inventors, brought far from their point of origin, inventions that became so universal and generalized that they entered some vast general intelligence or public domain of unknown and innumerable applications. Like the Chinese magnetic compass, this magnetism is at the core of magnetic resonance visualization technologies or part of the maglev (magnetic levitation) trains such as the Shanghai Transrapid, currently the oldest such commercial maglev tech still in operation.

9. What project are you dreaming about?

Common let us try and avoid the “project” dream – because of them we cannot dream any longer, they do drag on us. Let us rather search for new modes of conviviality – new ways of living co-dependently and not dependent, traveling around ourselves with our attention ecology widening, one gracious step to be able to parse time and space together, with modes of thinking and feeling, shared passions and also a shared disappearance.

Do not overshare – but try to join with unknown friends (or well-known ones) an unknown dusk, not a well-known rising of the sun. I am reading for a few years Dhalgren by Samuel R Delaney. It is a fabulous way to get lost in the thickets of that book, providing dense vertigo, stylistically flawless, written in 1975 one year before I was born. A shelter of a book for difficult and demanding times, an amorphous bloom that is nearly impossible to keep hold on to and that nevertheless offers numerous stepping stones towards a misaligned friendship and a living in between the cracks of this world.